Go to: [Action Alerts][Bill Status][Prior Newsletters][FCL Homepage] [Picture of Capitol]

FCL NEWSLETTER -- January, 2002

Recommendations to Voters -- by the FCL Executive Committee
Ballot Measures -- March 2002 Primary Election
Budget Squeeze -- $12 Billion Shortfall
Terror -- The State Response
New Staff Members -- Stephen Myers, Ira Saletan
Politics of Redistricting -- Primariy Importance
Subscribe -- Receive FCL's Newsletter by regular mail
Whatever Happened To?
Articles in Prior Newsletters

Recommendations to Voters

FCL makes the following recommendations for the March 2002 Ballot Propositions:

  • Proposition 40 -- Yes
    -- - Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act
  • Proposition 41 -- Yes
    -- - Voting Modernization Act
  • Proposition 42 -- No
    -- - Transportation Funding: Sales Tax Revenues
  • Proposition 43 -- Yes
    -- - Right to Have Vote Counted
  • Proposition 44 -- No position
    -- - Insurance Fraud
  • Proposition 45 -- Yes
    -- - Legislative Term Limits; Local Voter Petitions

    Ballot Measures for March of 2002

    The March Primary Ballot will present the voters with six measures, including two general obligation bonds, two amendments to the constitution, one measure that modifies a previously adopted initiative, and one initiative placed on the ballot by petition. Here are the recommendations of the FCL Executive Committee, with analyses by staff. In the one instance where FCL takes no position this year, the committee did not reach unity.

    Proposition 40: Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act

    This measure will enable agencies up and down the state to undertake $2.6 billion worth of habitat protection, recreation land acquisitions, clean water projects, air pollution control activity, and similar investments over the next several years. Funds from the last similar bond measure, passed in March 2000, have been largely obligated. Proposition 40 will permit the environmental work to continue. Opponents note that the stateÕs credit rating has slipped in recent months, and that bonds are more expensive than pay-as-you-go financing. However, they have not managed to come up with alternative funding for the projects that are important to the quality of life for future generations. During an economic downturn, it makes sense to use bonds for projects like these that can give a boost to the economy.
    FCL SUPPORTS
    Link to
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; support; opposition

    Proposition 41: Voting Modernization Act

    Counties would be assisted in replacing outdated vote tabulating systems under the program to be funded by $200 million of general obligation bonds in this measure. A local match of $1 for every $3 of state funds is required under the measure. Most counties have been so under-funded since the enactment of the Jarvis-Gann Property Tax Limitation Act (Proposition 13) that they have not modernized voting procedures, even though the cost is relatively low. Opponents contend that funding should come from other sources, but that is unlikely. With the recent Florida ballot controversy in mind, it seems reasonable to approve this modernization effort.
    FCL SUPPORTS
    Link to
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; support

    Proposition 42: Transportation Funding: Sales Tax Revenues

    Sales and Use Tax Revenues. This measure would mandate that General Fund revenues from sales taxes on automobile fuel be spent on transportation projects, regardless of other state and local funding needs. In order to offset the inflexibility of such a requirement, the measure provides an escape mechanism in the form of a resolution proposed by the Governor and approved by two-thirds of the members of each house. The problem is that this escape can be blocked by just a few legislators who might favor road construction over human services. The economic downturn and current-year budget problems illustrate how restrictive and problematic such a requirement can be. The state needs as much flexibility as possible to meet unforeseeable fiscal demands. This proposal unnecessarily ties the hands of government.
    FCL OPPOSES
    Link to:
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; opposition; support; commentary

    Proposition 43: Right to Have Vote Counted

    The right to have one's ballot counted would be placed in the State Constitution by this measure. An accompanying statute spells out the effects of this change, and provides guidance to courts in cases where recount requirements or post-election litigation leads to conflicts between various provisions of the elections law. The clarifications contained in this measure will provide useful guidance for the resolution of disputes in this arena.
    FCL SUPPORTS
    Link to
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; support;opposition

    Proposition 44: Insurance Fraud

    This statutory amendment, seeking to prevent the submission of false insurance claims, appears on the ballot because the regulation of chiropractors in general was enacted by the voters through the initiative process. The Legislature has revised laws applicable to other individuals involved in submission of insurance claims, and the voters are offered the opportunity to make the penalties pertaining to chiropractors consistent with the increased penalties applicable to others. Friends usually do not favor increases in penalties of any kind.
    FCL TAKES NO POSITION
    Link to
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; support; opposition

    Proposition 45: Legislative Term Limits; Local Voter Petitions

    This measure would permit the electors of a State Assembly or Senate district to re-elect a Legislator for a term or terms totaling four additional years when existing term limits have been reached, if 20 percent of the district electorate has signed petitions to that effect. Term limits have resulted in rapid turnover of state legislators and important institutional memory is being lost. Inexperienced legislators can hardly be expected to exercise oversight of large state agencies. By permitting some members who are sufficiently popular in their districts to remain in office for an additional four years, the excessive turnover of policy makers can be somewhat moderated.
    FCL SUPPORTS
    Link to
    Legislative Analyst's cost analysis; support;opposition; commentary; politics

    Link to other organizational recommendations:
    CA Chamber of Commerce

    The Budget Squeeze

    The recession has caused an estimated $12 billion drop in state revenue. Having spent billions of dollars during the last budget year in a largely unsuccessful effort to prevent ncreases in electric rates, policy makers are now scrambling to reduce expenditures. When the problem surfaced last fall, the Governor ordered a Òhiring freezeÓ and suspended a great deal of state spending on authorized projects. For example, some $30 million for an expansion of after-school programs for low-income families that FCL had worked hard to institute is being delayed.

    However, 'public safety' spending was generally exempted from the freeze. This produces some strange results: for example, we are told that prison guards who retire could be replaced, but not prison chaplains. There are thousands of guards, but few chaplains ÐÐ less than one for each prison yard. Yet, chaplains play an essential role of reducing stress in institutions. Also, despite recent declines in the prison population, and a scathing Auditor GeneralÕs report exposing financial irregularities in the $5 billion State Corrections budget, the Governor wants to build and staff another new prison near Bakersfield.

    We think it is a mistake to exempt any agency from the budget-cutting strategy. Favoring police and fire agencies tends to shift the burdens of fiscal stringency onto agencies that build stronger communities. We think effective schools, more affordable housing, better mental health, and improved care for pregnant women and young mothers are the keys to real public safety.

    The State Responds to Terror

    The dramatic terror attacks of September 11 are reverberating in the State Capitol. As Congress tries to balance surveillance and civil liberties, state legislators have been considering ways that California can best avert or respond to similar attacks.

    At an informational hearing in Sacramento, Attorney General Bill Lockyer described his efforts to manage the problems inherent in coordinating the efforts of thousands of law enforcement officers in hundreds of different agencies, any one of whom may gain information that relates to a potential threat or attack. Some sheriffs and police chiefs are seeking a voter initiative to add a quarter-cent increase in sales tax for six years, to meet the estimated billion dollar annual cost of added security, surveillance, training, and equipment to address terrorist threats.

    In addition, the Republican Caucus is beating the drum for additional penalties and more wiretapping authority in cases involving terrorists. They want to make CaliforniaÕs death penalty and wiretapping laws expli-citly applicable to people who use intimidation or coercion to influence or retaliate against government conduct.

    Past experience in this area leads us to resist wholesale changes in the law concerning threats and terror. CaliforniaÕs existing statute regarding threatening statements, intended to apply to street gangs, has too frequently been used to convert marital disputes into felony prosecutions. In the Unabomber case, Ted KaczynskiÕs brother might have had second thoughts about turning his brother in to authorities if the likelihood of a death penalty prosecution had been foremost in his mind. Extensive surveillance of the populace is more likely to expose people engaged in petty misdeeds than to prevent an act of terror.

    It is important to remember that the most effective bulwark against terrorists is the respect that citizens have for a just government. When people support their society, terrorists are for the most part denied the aid and moral justification they need to disrupt it. Any government that tries to rely too greatly on surveillance, imprisonment, and reprisals can undermine the public support that is its most important asset. |

    March 19th, 2002 Sacramento Advisory Workshop ‘Leave No Child Behind' W. Angela Blackwell Contact FCL for more information.

    FCL Welcomes New Staff Members

    Ira Saletan, Development &Outreach Coordinator

    Ira Saletan comes to FCL with 20 years of service in community-based and public-interest organizations, as well as private firms and public agencies.

    Ira has coordinated development and outreach initiatives on housing, public health, social services, transportation, education, and cross- cultural training. He has worked with African-American, Latino, Native American and Southeast Asian (Hmong and other) communities, and has been an environmental planner and a substitute teacher.

    In 1976, he left Amherst College in Massachusetts to walk and organize in the Continental Walk for Disarmament and Social Justice. Ira later worked with American Friends Service Committee in Connecticut and as an organizer in Indiana before coming to California. He earned his masterÕs degree in City and Regional Planning from U.C. Berkeley, and was a prison correspondent and visitor during this time.

    Ira is a native of New York and has lived in the Sacramento area since 1984. He grew up in a Jewish family, was an active Unitarian Universalist, and has attended Friends Meetings in Massachusetts and California. He practices yoga, swims, is a sports fan and also a student mentor.

    Stephen Myers, Newsletter Editor

    Stephen Myers continues an almost decade-long involvement with Friends organizations with his new position at FCL. This fact is especially impressive considering he is only 25 years old.

    For Stephen, who was raised in a pastoral meeting in Indiana, Westtown School was an eye-opening experience. It was the first time he began to learn about QuakersÕ leadership in struggles for peace and social justice, which began a profound transfor-mation in how he thought about the world.

    Stephen graduated from Haverford College. He worked as a camp counselor at Catoctin Quaker Camp, part of Baltimore Yearly MeetingÕs camping program, was the Residential Intern at Quaker Center, and taught at John Woolman School.

    The Proof is in the Primaries
    the Politics of Redistricting

    [Go to Top]

    Go to: [Action Alerts][Bill Status][Prior Newsletters][FCL Homepage]

    Subscribe to the FCL Newsletter

    You can have each issue of the FCL Newsletter mailed to your home or place of business, simply by mailing a request to our office, together with a check for $20 ($7 low-income). Bundle subscriptions to a meeting, congregation, or other group may also be arranged at a cost of $75.

    Friends Committee on Legislation 717 K St., Suite 500-B, Sacramento, CA 95814-3408 (916) 443-3734

    To send e-mail to FCL click

     


    This page was last updated December 20, 2001; it is supported by Peacetree.

    Recent access at this site. Link to the Peacetree homepage for Alternatives To Violence, Peaceworkers, and others...

    Hosted by WebCom